1 Comment

1. 

   nomen nescio

   August 6, 2021 at 9:33 PM

   1. Why is the picture at the top a CZ75 compact rather than the pistol the article is about?

   2. The PT92 is the only thing Taurus makes that isn’t a dumpster fire. This is because they have never gotten around to having a separate production line for these. They’re all produced on the same line as the guns for the Brazilian military, so they have to do a little QC.

   I will say that if you are one of the three guys who like the Beretta 92 design, the PT92 has a superior frame-mounted safety, though I wish it didn’t have the decocker function. Decockers and DA/SA are an abomination in the eyes of the Lord and John Moses Browning. On the other hand, you know, I’ve never heard of a PT92’s slide fracturing in use and hitting the shooter in the face. Nor have I ever heard of a PT92 locking block cracking or chipping, unlike the ones Beretta makes. Though these may be more indictments of Beretta’s QC than endorsements of Taurus products. There’s a reason the M9 was only in service thirty years and never fully supplanted the M1911A1 for the guys at the sharp end.

   Reply