Connect with us

Featured

Breaking: Federal Appeals Court Rules Second Amendment Doesn’t Give Right To Carry A Weapon

Published

on

Bill of Rights

Apparently, the Second Amendment doesn't apply…

According to an 11 judge panel in the 9th US Court of Appeals, the Second Amendment does not grant the right of the people to carry a concealed gun in public. They said that the law was never written in that manner, and that law enforcement officials alone should have the say of whether or not individuals can have a gun. The catch, is that you can only get one after you prove that you need a concealed carry gun for protection.

This decision was made on a 7-4 majority, with Judge Fletcher speaking for the winning majority: “We hold that the Second Amendment does not preserve or protect a right of a member of the general public to carry concealed firearms in public.”

Of course, this does nothing but eventually raise the question to the Supreme Court, concerning similar rules. And, if this is challenged, which we assume it will be, this will go to the highest court.

Yet another important reason why we must be ever so careful this election season. Because, no matter what they may say, there is an attack on the Second Amendment and its current interpretation.

Yet, we aren't sure what is left up to interpretation. After all, the Second Amendment says this: A Well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the Right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.

The people are the militia. The people have a right to keep and bear arms. That right shall not be infringed. It's so simple, a caveman could understand it. It was written that way for a reason…Because it cannot be taken away. Period.

Sound Off Gun Carriers! What do you think about this nonsense? Do you think this will go to the Supreme Court? What do you think the outcome of it will be?

My source for this article was Fox News.

Continue Reading
6 Comments

6 Comments

  1. joe brumfield

    June 26, 2016 at 4:14 PM

    TELL THEM TO ST AND IN – PEACH ANY ONE THAT THINKS THAT .

  2. mikey

    June 26, 2016 at 8:51 AM

    People try to go around the main saying of things these days. They are idiots period. And yes maybe we should cut California off and let it float away

  3. George Steele

    June 26, 2016 at 8:44 AM

    The Ninth Circus Crock of Schlemiels is the most overturned court for a reason; they have no ability to reason. The left coast is mired in a cesspool of PC fools, assembled in a circle, focusing their foolish mental energy inward like the radiation of fuel in a nuclear weapon – moving inexorably toward a critical mass of idiocy that explodes and kills them all – unfortunately taking us all with them. There’s no solution – because as we all know, you can’t fix stupid. The San Andreas Fault is proof that God and Nature is on our side . . .

  4. Jim Robinett

    June 26, 2016 at 7:30 AM

    The silly court said that the second amendment does not give the right to carry a CONCEALED weapon, does that mean that one can carry the weapon in plain sight, sounds like what they are saying. 2nd amendment plainly states ” to keep and bear arms” does it NOT? So where do these idiots get off telling us what we can or cannot do when it is spelled out exactly in the Constitution of the united States of America?

  5. Richard

    June 19, 2016 at 9:33 AM

    I think the 2nd amendment is what it is. ! The right to carry ,real simple

  6. Herb

    June 10, 2016 at 1:39 AM

    California should break off the mainland and float away with them on it .

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

SIGN UP NOW

Enter for a chance to WIN this Customized AR-15 when you sign up today for our exclusive email newsletter subscription.